Click here for article: 80 percent agreement on health care? No way that's true
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama has said this repeatedly: Members of Congress agree on "about 80 percent of what needs to be done" to overhaul America's health care system.
Democratic congressional leaders have echoed that claim, using it to underscore that overhauling America's health care system is within their grasp.
No one, however, can offer specifics about what that 80 percent entails, other than to say that everyone agrees on key principles. A lot of lawmakers scoff at the figure, particularly since Democrats disagree sharply on two central elements: Whether to create a government-run health-insurance plan, and how to pay for all the changes under discussion.
"I don't know what that number means. I have no idea how you'd calculate something like that," said Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee. On Wednesday that panel labored through another round of bill drafting. It hopes to finish its work later this week, but final congressional action on the legislation is still probably months _and lots of tense votes and debates — away.
Conrad's view has bipartisan support.
"I don't see it," said Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio, a centrist Republican whom Democrats often woo.
"Most of the 80 percent doesn't involve money," quipped Finance Committee member Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.
Nevertheless, "80 percent" has become Washington-speak for legislative progress on Obama's major 2009 domestic initiative.
Obama regularly cites the number.
"There is agreement in this chamber on about 80 percent of what needs to be done, putting us closer to the goal of reform that we have ever been," he told a joint session of Congress on Sept. 9. Eleven days later, he told CNN that "basically we've got 80 percent agreement."
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs tried Wednesday to explain what Obama meant:
"I think it represents a confluence by many involved in the health care reform debate on agreement as to how we get affordable, accessible insurance for 30 million Americans that don't have it, how we get important insurance reforms and how we cut costs for millions of Americans that are fortunate to have health insurance."
However, it was noted, no health care measure today would get 80 percent support in Congress.
"The 80 percent number wasn't to be used in any scenario," Gibbs replied.
Yet the 80 percent mantra has become Democratic gospel.
After meeting with Obama on Sept. 8, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., even went one better, declaring: "We think we're up to 90 percent of things there are agreed upon."
A few days later, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters that of the bills approved so far by four congressional committees, "we're at least 80, 85 percent in harmony. We have to resolve the remaining pieces of it. That is very much within range."
Asked to clarify what those percentages mean, Reid spokesman Jim Manley said, "There is no list, but the House and Senate are getting closer to action."
Pelosi spokesman Nadeam Elshami said that the figure represents agreement among Democrats and includes accords on barring companies from rejecting people with pre-existing conditions, creating an insurance exchange or marketplace, helping lower income people get coverage, and increasing Medicare prescription drug benefits for seniors.
To be sure, lawmakers do agree on certain principles.
"They agree everyone should have access to affordable coverage and the market should be reformed," said Elizabeth Carpenter, associate policy director of the New America Foundation's Health Policy Center, a liberal research group.
Karen Ignagni, the president and chief executive officer at America's Health Insurance Plans, listed specific areas of agreement: Requiring everyone to seek coverage, increasing the safety net by providing help for lower-income people, and making changes in the insurance market.
However, Carpenter noted: "Where there's not agreement is on the choices necessary to solve the problem."
Democrats are split over whether to back the public option, a government-run insurance plan, or instead to encourage co-ops -- nonprofit consumer-run companies that would provide coverage. Most Republicans oppose both ideas.
And wide divisions still split Democrats about where to find revenue, with Republicans flatly opposed to the leading proposals. House Democratic leaders prefer imposing income tax surcharges on wealthier taxpayers, while Finance Committee Democrats are eyeing a 40 percent excise tax on high-end insurance policies.
Committee votes have rarely reflected an 80 percent majority on anything major. The House Energy and Commerce Committee approved health care legislation this summer by 31-28. The Senate Finance Committee this week rejected two efforts to include a public option, by 15-8 and 13-10.
Other flashpoints remain, notably on abortion, Medicare and other hot topics. These aren't small details; there are wide gaps on each, lawmakers concede.
Maybe that's why, when pressed, Democratic leaders edge back from the 80 percent claim. On Tuesday, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., cited comments on health care recently by Republican Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia, and saw little common ground.
"It did not appear to me to leap off the page that we agree with 80 percent of what has been proposed," Hoyer concluded.
(Margaret Talev and William Douglas contributed to this article.)
Obama Watch
- "The Making of George W. Obama." Foreign Policy Magizine
- Obama Bush Continuity: Reason TV: Barrack W. Bush
- Obama Top Economic Advisors Took Bribes from JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Others
- WSJ: Obama Using TARP to Control Banks
- WSJ to Obama: How Not to Fight Discrimination
- Reuters: Businesses Move to Switzerland to Avoid Obama
- Economist Give Obama and Team Failing Grade So Far
- Newsweek, Howard Fineman Critiques Obama: "He'd have made a fine judge. But we don't need a judge."
- Liberal Economist Paul Krugman Criticises Pres. Obama's Economics
- Wall Street Journal: Is Our Troubled Economy a Responce to Obama's Policies?
- Jim Cramer: Is this Friend of Democrats on Obama's Enemies List? His Responce.
- Reuters: Obama Budget Sends $11,000 Bill to Every American
- Wall Street Journal: Obama's Mortgage Plan: Dukes of Moral Hazzard
- Obama Rhetoric is a Real Problem - Wall Street Journal
- CATO Calls Out Obama Admin's Lie About Economists
- Congressional Budget Office Says Obama Stimulus Will Hurt Economy in Long Term
- Peter Schiff (you know, the guy who predicted the current crisis) Say Obama Stimulus Will be a Disaster
- Obama "Stimulus" Bill May Have Serious Problems
Past Articles: March 24 - Aprile 16
- WSJ: The Greatness of Capitalism Can Save Us: Lessons from the Recovery of 2001
- Democrats: Merit-Based Pay? Fugetaboutit !
- Deregulation? Bush was the Biggest Regulator in Decades
- The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One
- Cost for Bailout Jumps...Again.
- Watchdogs: Treasury Still Wont Release Details of Bailouts
- How NOT to Fight Discrimination - Obama Admin Goes After Wal-Mart
- "A Moderate Manifesto" David Brooks Feels Betrayed By Obama - NYTIMES
- George Will - The Toxic Assets We Elected
- The REAL AIG Disgrace - WSJ
Past Articles of the Day - Feb 9 - March 24 2008
- Wells Fargo Chief Critiques Bailout, Calls Plan "Asinine"
- Government Forces Doctor to Raise Fees
- NY Times: "Stimulus Report" Further Evidence that Central Planning Does Not Work
- Bailout Woes Continue With Citi
- WSJ: How California Became France. (one of the best articles I have read)
- Investing Legend Jim Rogers Speaks on the Economy
- The Popular Uprising Against Central Banking
- Tax Payer Risk 9.7 Trillion on Crisis
- Pushing Banks to Loan Could Backfire - WSJ
- Fed Still Refuses to Disclose Recipients of 2 Trillion Dollars
- Government Watchdog Agencies Chide Treasury On Bailout Handling - WSJ
- China Lectures Paulson on Economic Policy - US No Longer Holds Moral High Ground
- Sen. Jim Demint: "Republicans Must Fight for Freedom to Regain America's Trust"
- The Other Auto Industry
- Is Uncle Sam's Credit Line Running Out?
- Obama's Clinton Problem: Deregulation Led to the Prosperity of the 90's; Just Ask Bill Clinton
Past Articles of the Day
- Why Republicans Need to Get Back to their Roots
- Gun Control and Crime
- Myth: Ethanol is Great.
- Silly Senator, Corn is for Food! Why Ethanol is not What It's Cracked Up to Be.
- Freedom to Choose Flat Tax
- What Happened to Detriot
- Great Article on Ivy League Schools by William Deresiewicz
- America is the World's Highest Drug User
- Petro-politics: As Oil Prices Rise, Human Rights Go Down. by Thomas Friedman, Foreign Policy Magazine
- Finally! Democrats Vote to "Privatize" a Wastful Goverment Program!!!
- Unlike Others, U.S. Defends Freedom to Offend in Speech - NYTimes
- Wall Street Journal: "Our Collectivist Candidates" by David Boaz
- We Knew About the "Housing Crisis" Well Before it Struck
- The Trillion Dollar War
- "Yes, the Market is Unfair" - Insightful Article on the Economics of the Stock Market
- Ron Paul's Libertarian Lesson for John McCain (U.S. News W.R.)
- Raw Milk - More Government Shutting Down Legitimate Business Under False Pretense
- 5 Myths About No Child Left Behind
- Making College More Expensive: The Unintended Consequences of Federal Tuition Aid
- What If Public Schools Were Abolished?
- Ten Days the Changed Capitalism
- Universal Health Care: '08 Presidential Race
- Florida Looks to Regulate Toilet Paper in Bathrooms
- "Unfettered Speech, Now" by Bradly Smith & Steve Simpson
- Litigating for Liberty
- 1 in 100 U.S. Adults Behind Bars, New Study Says
- Scalia the Civil Libertarian? by The New York Times
- Montana: They'll Cecede From the Union if Supreme Court Rules Wrong
- Of Horses Teeth and Liberty. by The Economist
- Americans Go to Mexico for Affordable Dental Care
- US Military May Not Be Ready for Attack
- How Cincinnati Turned It's Schools Around
- "Waving Goodbye to Hegemony" by Parag Khanna, NY Times
- "Social Entrepreneurs" - Better Than Government Activism
- The Education of Ben Bernake
- Bush's Stimulus Flop
- Stimulus Stupidity
- Inflation and the Tax Man
- Why Ignorance Is'nt Bliss. How Ignorance Threatens Democracy
- Newsweek: "Bothersome Intel on Iran"
- Liberal-tarians
- GOP Fusion Comes Unfused
- Financial Times: "An Ottoman warning for indebted America"
- "American Power. Still #1" by The Economist
- How to Fire and Incompetent Teacher
- Few senators read Iraq NIE report
- US Mercantilist Machismo, China Replaces Japan
- Ten Days the Changed Capitalism
No comments:
Post a Comment